Electrochemical Energy Reviews ›› 2025, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (2): 9-.doi: 10.1007/s41918-025-00242-3

• • 上一篇    下一篇

Solid-State Electrolytes and Their Interfacial Properties: Implications for Solid-State Lithium Batteries

Seul-Yi Lee1, Jishu Rawal2, Jieun Lee3, Jagadis Gautam1, Seok Kim4, Gui-Liang Xu3, Khalil Amine3, Soo-Jin Park1,5   

  1. 1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, Kyung Hee University, Yongin 17104, Republic of Korea;
    2. Department of Chemistry, Inha University, 100 Inharo, Incheon 22212, Republic of Korea;
    3. Chemical Sciences and Engineering Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL 60439, USA;
    4. Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Pusan National University, 2 Busandaehak-Ro, Busan 46241, Republic of Korea;
    5. Department of Advanced Materials Engineering for Information and Electronics, Kyung Hee University, Yongin 17104, Republic of Korea
  • 收稿日期:2024-04-14 修回日期:2024-11-27 出版日期:2025-06-20 发布日期:2025-11-12
  • 通讯作者: Gui-Liang Xu Email:E-mail:xug@anl.gov;Khalil Amine Email:E-mail:amine@anl.gov;Soo-Jin Park Email:E-mail:soojinpark@khu.ac.kr E-mail:xug@anl.gov;amine@anl.gov;soojinpark@khu.ac.kr
  • 基金资助:
    This study was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (Grant No. 2022M3J7A1062940), and Research at the Argonne National Laboratory, funded by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Vehicle Technologies Office.

Solid-State Electrolytes and Their Interfacial Properties: Implications for Solid-State Lithium Batteries

Seul-Yi Lee1, Jishu Rawal2, Jieun Lee3, Jagadis Gautam1, Seok Kim4, Gui-Liang Xu3, Khalil Amine3, Soo-Jin Park1,5   

  1. 1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, Kyung Hee University, Yongin 17104, Republic of Korea;
    2. Department of Chemistry, Inha University, 100 Inharo, Incheon 22212, Republic of Korea;
    3. Chemical Sciences and Engineering Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL 60439, USA;
    4. Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Pusan National University, 2 Busandaehak-Ro, Busan 46241, Republic of Korea;
    5. Department of Advanced Materials Engineering for Information and Electronics, Kyung Hee University, Yongin 17104, Republic of Korea
  • Received:2024-04-14 Revised:2024-11-27 Online:2025-06-20 Published:2025-11-12
  • Contact: Gui-Liang Xu Email:E-mail:xug@anl.gov;Khalil Amine Email:E-mail:amine@anl.gov;Soo-Jin Park Email:E-mail:soojinpark@khu.ac.kr E-mail:xug@anl.gov;amine@anl.gov;soojinpark@khu.ac.kr
  • Supported by:
    This study was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (Grant No. 2022M3J7A1062940), and Research at the Argonne National Laboratory, funded by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Vehicle Technologies Office.

摘要: Solid-state batteries (SSBs) have emerged as a promising alternative technology for advancing global electrification efforts. The SSBs offer significant advantages over conventional electrolyte-based batteries, including enhanced safety, increased energy density, and improved performance. Their non-flammability, enhanced thermal and mechanical stability, and lower self-discharge rates make them particularly promising for future energy solutions. However, their prevalent implementation in large-scale industries is inhibited by inadequate ionic conductivity and the interfacial challenges associated with solid-state electrolytes (SSEs). These challenges include suboptimal solid–solid contact, grain boundary limitations, poor wettability, and unfavorable phenomena such as dendrite growth, interface voids, interdiffusion layer formation, and lattice mismatch. This comprehensive review meticulously examines recent developments and prospects in SSEs, categorizing them into halide, sulfide, oxide, hydride, and polymer types. It then analyzes the challenges and interfacial limitations of SSBs, including dendrite growth, voids, cracks, contact issues, lattice mismatch, and interdiffusion. In addition, potential solutions for enhancing interfacial adherence between electrodes and SSEs are outlined. Furthermore, recent trends in the SSB industry, including successfully commercialized products, are highlighted. Finally, this review explores the future potential of SSEs in advanced SSBs, projecting their significant industrial impact.

关键词: Li battery, Solid-state battery, Solid-state electrolyte, Electrode–electrolyte interface

Abstract: Solid-state batteries (SSBs) have emerged as a promising alternative technology for advancing global electrification efforts. The SSBs offer significant advantages over conventional electrolyte-based batteries, including enhanced safety, increased energy density, and improved performance. Their non-flammability, enhanced thermal and mechanical stability, and lower self-discharge rates make them particularly promising for future energy solutions. However, their prevalent implementation in large-scale industries is inhibited by inadequate ionic conductivity and the interfacial challenges associated with solid-state electrolytes (SSEs). These challenges include suboptimal solid–solid contact, grain boundary limitations, poor wettability, and unfavorable phenomena such as dendrite growth, interface voids, interdiffusion layer formation, and lattice mismatch. This comprehensive review meticulously examines recent developments and prospects in SSEs, categorizing them into halide, sulfide, oxide, hydride, and polymer types. It then analyzes the challenges and interfacial limitations of SSBs, including dendrite growth, voids, cracks, contact issues, lattice mismatch, and interdiffusion. In addition, potential solutions for enhancing interfacial adherence between electrodes and SSEs are outlined. Furthermore, recent trends in the SSB industry, including successfully commercialized products, are highlighted. Finally, this review explores the future potential of SSEs in advanced SSBs, projecting their significant industrial impact.

Key words: Li battery, Solid-state battery, Solid-state electrolyte, Electrode–electrolyte interface